WAR ON YOU FORUMS
November 20, 2009, 08:38:07 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Donations Login Register News  
Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SOMETHING OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS IS HAPPENING by Tim Wood  (Read 6881 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Raven
Global Moderator
Public Enemy # 1
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12066



« on: December 16, 2008, 03:21:45 PM »

http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNsomethinghistoriccomment.html


SOMETHING OF HISTORIC PROPORTIONS IS HAPPENING
by Tim Wood
2008 December 1

I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied history all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten - fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two years. We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learn just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money, yours and mine. And that is three times the 700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not, they now control us.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why? We have intentionally dumb down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents of why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, and school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over proposition 8 that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing un-elected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government, our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about) the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x ten.

And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so. And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla, Alaska. All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, religion and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course the media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe is more important.)

Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: change. Why? I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now. This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again. And that is only the beginning to a world social government.

I thought I would never be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the messiah was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully them into submission. And then, he was duly elected to office, a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department-by-department, person-by-person, bureaucracy-by-bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the indigent, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe, and across the world.

He did it with a compliant media; did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and ‘CHANGE’. And the people surely got what they voted for. (Look it up if you think that I am exaggerating.) Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. Don’t forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe. It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years, a shorter time span than just two terms of a U. S. presidency, it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors, all with the best of intentions of course. The road to Hell is always paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another drink, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.

Some people scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe and why I believe it. I pray I am wrong. Pray with me for the truth, because the truth will set us free.


.
Logged

Truth Does Not Fear Investigation.
Magickman
Revolutionist
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 598



WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2008, 03:32:54 PM »

I too am somewhat afraid of the "change," as apart of me thinks perhaps the change talked about is not the change we all want and need. for instance, what if Obama decides to go ahead with the NAFTA Highway, and integrates the US with Canada and Mexico, with full open borders? What if he decides it would be a good idea to ban guns for Americans? Or use the many concentration camps being built at taxpayer expense for people like us, in this forum? What if Obama thinks the US would be better if it were a police state? So many "ifs" one cannot count them all. Yes, I am afraid for my children, and everyone should do the same.  We do not know what will happen.
Logged

"When you are awake the dream is gone...
When you are Enlightened the 'world of illusion' is gone...
...and the TRUTH will make you FREE."

"There is no religion higher than TRUTH
Raven
Global Moderator
Public Enemy # 1
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12066



« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2008, 04:24:25 PM »


http://waronyou.com/forums/index.php?topic=4462.msg9844#msg9844



http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2008/ss_military0790_12_15.asp


Monday, December 15, 2008

Doomsday: U.S. report warns of 'strategic shock' leading to massive unrest
WASHINGTON
— The United States could be sleep-walking into its next crisis, a military report said.


The report by the U.S. Army
War College's Strategic Institute, said that a defense community paralyzed by conventional thinking could be unprepared to help the United States cope with a series of unexpected crises that would rival the Al Qaida strikes in 2001, termed a "strategic shock."

The report cited the prospect of the collapse of a nuclear state leading to massive unrest in the United States.

"Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security," the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt. Col. Nathan Freir, said.
         
"Deliberate employment of weapons of mass destruction or other catastrophic capabilities, unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters are all paths to disruptive domestic shock."

Titled "Known Unknowns: Unconventional Strategic Shocks in Defense Strategy Development," the report warned that the U.S. military and intelligence community remain mired in the past as well as the need to accommodate government policy. Freier, a former Pentagon official, said that despite the Al Qaida surprise in 2001 U.S. defense strategy and planning remain trapped by "excessive convention."

"The current administration confronted a game-changing 'strategic shock' inside its first eight months in office," the report said. "The next administration would be well-advised to expect the same during the course of its first term. Indeed, the odds are very high against any of the challenges routinely at the top of the traditional defense agenda triggering the next watershed inside DoD [Department of Defense]."

The report cited the collapse of what Freier termed "a large capable state that results in a nuclear civil war." Such a prospect could lead to uncontrolled weapons of mass destruction proliferation as well as a nuclear war.

The report cited the prospect of a breakdown of order in the United States. Freier said the Pentagon could be suddenly forced to recall troops from abroad to fight domestic unrest.

"An American government and defense establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home," the report said.

The report said the United States could also come under pressure from a hostile state with control over insurgency groups. The hostile state could force American decision-makers into a desperate response.

"The United States might also consider the prospect that hostile state and/or nonstate actors might individually or in concert combine hybrid methods effectively to resist U.S. influence in a nonmilitary manner," the report said. "This is clearly an emerging trend."

"The aforementioned are admittedly extreme," the report said. "They are not, however, implausible or fantastical."
Logged

Truth Does Not Fear Investigation.
indoubleyousee
Conspirator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2009, 01:27:37 PM »

Authorship of this article is misidentified on many other websites: http://sbuschollian.blogspot.com/2009/03/historian-deals-with-online-identity.html

Despite its attempt at deception (or maybe even because of it), I appreciate that someone sent this essay to me for the simple reason that it troubled me and got me to thinking and researching.
The first sign of trouble is the way the article starts, "I am a student of history. Professionally. I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied it all my life." No sound professional will start a serious essay in this manner. There is no indication of who this person really is. I tried to find out what these 15 books might be. Amazon offers about that many history books written by Tim Wood, most of which are aimed at an audience age 9 to 12 and average 48 pages each. Given that even the most brilliant historian of all time might choose to remain relatively undiscovered by writing for an audience of pre-teens, I still am not impressed by the essayist's credentials.
Another occurrence at duping readers is, "I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about." This rhetoric screams, "I don't know what I'm talking about!" My translation of this sentence is something like, "Because I am unwilling and/or unable to establish my credentials, I'm going to demand that you respect me blindly." First, professors do not necessarily know what they are talking about just because they teach college. Considered within context, " . . . our education system is worse than a joke," we really need to know where this professor teaches. No college professor worth a salary is going to judge the entire education system based on one college, especially when, for all we know this is a professor who teaches remedial history at a community college in Whoknowswhere, USA.
In any case, back to the essay. If that's not enough for this self-proclaimed prophet, he promotes his message "as a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions." How does he qualify his "objective" view? "I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it." Okay . . . who can argue with that? Sorry, but that’s not rational, much less practical.
Essays like this and the people who get roused by them illustrate the harm that a little bit of education and a whole lot of arrogance can do to a population. The author conveniently omits one of the greatest elements of the Third Reich that allowed its successful rise: nationalism. Nazis successfully drew upon German nationalism and fear to motivate the masses after WWI. Fear itself can be a dangerous thing when it leads us to similar reactions to threats.
Finally, this author provides no solution to the problem he fabricates. This vacancy is unforgivable. His cry of warning is the equivalent of a driver yelling, "You're going to get hit by a car!” just before he runs over you. He intentionally evokes fear, but does nothing to help you. Okay, I will concede that he encourages us to “Look it up if you think I am exaggerating” and to “Read your history books.” However, it still comes across as arrogant, translated as, “No need to look it up because I’ve already done all the work for you, and I’m here to tell you what you should be thinking about it!”
To say the least, the essay reeks of amateur application of historical perspectives and ethics. The fact that so many people with good intentions are quick to lap up his sophomoric rhetoric is far more disturbing to me than his message. If readers are already prone to agree with a writer like this, they are only encouraged to justify their fear, rather than actually challenged to think for themselves. For me, I can’t hear what this writer is so desperately trying to say because I have no reason to trust him in the first place. He tries so hard to convince me that he is right that his message remains out of focus. As a result, all I get out of it is that another radical extremist is trying to warn us of another political conspiracy.

Logged
Raven
Global Moderator
Public Enemy # 1
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12066



« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2009, 02:15:57 PM »

The problem with your reply to this is the fact that it is SLAM full of assumptions and your personal opinion. You not only ASSume that the writer was masquerading as someone else, you follow up on that ASSumption with condemnation of not just the writer but the article. You also go to lengths to back up your opinion and imply that anyone who could possibly agree with this work is ignorant or given to following radical extremists.
That sir in my book makes YOU a propagandist and a deceiver by claiming YOUR scholarly credentials qualify you to tell the rest of us what to think.
I have NO reason to trust you either and if you cannot get your head out of your letters long enough to look at what's going on around you, then I leave you to your delusions.
I choose to give air to what is an accurate description of the troubles we face and a call to pay attention to what is happening in this country and the world. The analogy to Germany was fitting and if you take issue with his omission of nationalism you are simply myopic in your view as there were MANY parties at play during that time. It was the overall political and financial atmosphere in which Hitler flourished that he brings up in his comparisons to Obama.
THAT, I believe is your BIGGEST problem with this piece. I do not like being told what to think by supposedly "learned" people like you. It was your damn "learned" ilk that got us into this damn mess to begin with. Maybe its time for the amateurs to have their say and clear out most of you smooth talking condescending BLOWHARDS.

Logged

Truth Does Not Fear Investigation.
WAR ON YOU
Soupy Dead Child
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3430



WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2009, 02:33:48 PM »

I do not like being told what to think by supposedly "learned" people like you. It was your damn "learned" ilk that got us into this damn mess to begin with. Maybe its time for the amateurs to have their say and clear out most of you smooth talking condescending BLOWHARDS.
Make room for the amateurs.  Laughing
Logged

Breaking News/Politics/Conspiracy Theories/US Law/Liberty & Freedom/Join the Damn Forum
WAR ON YOU - CHOOSE A SIDE!Why are you reading this?  Join the forum or drive yourself to the fema camps. Bermaturd!
Raven
Global Moderator
Public Enemy # 1
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12066



« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2009, 02:38:01 PM »

I got 14,400,000 hits on that name. How the hell do you narrow it down to one? I don't have any way of verifying who this is and why should it matter? His message is on target. That's more important than his pedigree. Millions of people write under pseudonyms and have an average education. Why would I attack his? To discredit him and thereby the article? No.
Logged

Truth Does Not Fear Investigation.
indoubleyousee
Conspirator
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2009, 03:12:25 PM »

Wow! You really jump to a lot of conclusions. I never claimed to know who wrote this article. I'm sure there are a lot of people named Tim Wood out there. I simply pointed out that some sites are crediting a certain Tim Wood that is a history professor at a certain college and that that professor has addressed that confusion on his blog. Did you even read that blog? In order for me to be a propagandist, I ASSume I must be spreading propaganda. Correct? However, I'm not sure I know what propaganda you think I am trying to spread, other than in your words, "scholarly credentials" that qualify me to tell you what to think. May I ask what "scholarly credential" you ASSume I have? Because I ASSure I have none. I'm a regular guy who drives a truck for a living my entire adult career, and hopefully will for the rest of my career if I am fortunate to have a job in the years to come. You, on the other hand, have proven yourself to be a very rude, abusive person with a chip on his/her shoulder, who enjoys attacking every sucker who comes along. If you are trying to shame me for voicing my opinion, then what does that make you? You call this intellectual discourse? All I hear you saying to me is that what I think doesn't matter because I'm a "smooth-talking, condescending blowhard." I made no attempt whatsoever to tell you or anyone else what to think. Just think, instead of soaking everything that comes out and claims to be written by an educated person with a position of authority, especially when that person is a poor writer in the first place. I admit that I don't know enough to argue the finer points of comparing Hitler to Obama, but this article is a very weak attempt to draw comparisons. I think I can do that myself without doing any research and without providing any substantial support for my argument, which is exactly what I see this essayist doing. I will fully respect your opinion that draws comparison between Obama and Hitler if you can do so logically, rationally, and with sound support; but if your only "sound support" is that you get paid to be a historian so everything you say about history is true, then I think we all should question you. Don't you think so? In stead of you telling me what is my "BIGGEST problem with this piece," let me try to state it for myself one more time: 1) It's poorly written. 2) It uses sensational rhetoric. 3) It makes historical generalizations without specific examples to back the argument. 4) It promotes no solution, which leads me to believe 5) that it simply is an effort to incite fear. So, I'm sure you and others are likely to refute my statements, which is wonderful and I am happy to entertain thoughtful insights. However, if all you want to do is bash me for being a "people like you" who "got us into this damn mess to begin with," then this is no forum for free thought and opinion.
Logged
oiram
Info Warrior
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1026



WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2009, 03:36:43 PM »

I too am somewhat afraid of the "change," as apart of me thinks perhaps the change talked about is not the change we all want and need. for instance, what if Obama decides to go ahead with the NAFTA Highway, and integrates the US with Canada and Mexico, with full open borders? What if he decides it would be a good idea to ban guns for Americans? Or use the many concentration camps being built at taxpayer expense for people like us, in this forum? What if Obama thinks the US would be better if it were a police state? So many "ifs" one cannot count them all. Yes, I am afraid for my children, and everyone should do the same.  We do not know what will happen.

  • We do not know what will happen.   = Bull! ..... I do but no one will listen because they all know better then any messenger.
    9/11 was the clear signal Afghanistan & Iraq was the clear declaration.
    The created Economical Crises is the finalization of the 9/11 Perl Harbor.

    Smart ass talking & Ignorance is what will brake all the faulty American pride.


« Last Edit: April 06, 2009, 03:43:40 PM by oiram » Logged

Unless they oppose it, they will be blamed for it. If they defend it, they are part of it.OBAMA DECEPTION Full: Here

LOOSE CHANGE: Here

ZEITGEIST: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kHhc67GopM
brandon dean
new traditionalist
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3664


There's many a slip 'twixt a cup and a lip...


WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2009, 03:42:31 PM »

Wow! You really jump to a lot of conclusions. I never claimed to know who wrote this article. I'm sure there are a lot of people named Tim Wood out there. I simply pointed out that some sites are crediting a certain Tim Wood that is a history professor at a certain college and that that professor has addressed that confusion on his blog. Did you even read that blog? In order for me to be a propagandist, I ASSume I must be spreading propaganda. Correct? However, I'm not sure I know what propaganda you think I am trying to spread, other than in your words, "scholarly credentials" that qualify me to tell you what to think. May I ask what "scholarly credential" you ASSume I have? Because I ASSure I have none. I'm a regular guy who drives a truck for a living my entire adult career, and hopefully will for the rest of my career if I am fortunate to have a job in the years to come. You, on the other hand, have proven yourself to be a very rude, abusive person with a chip on his/her shoulder, who enjoys attacking every sucker who comes along. If you are trying to shame me for voicing my opinion, then what does that make you? You call this intellectual discourse? All I hear you saying to me is that what I think doesn't matter because I'm a "smooth-talking, condescending blowhard." I made no attempt whatsoever to tell you or anyone else what to think. Just think, instead of soaking everything that comes out and claims to be written by an educated person with a position of authority, especially when that person is a poor writer in the first place. I admit that I don't know enough to argue the finer points of comparing Hitler to Obama, but this article is a very weak attempt to draw comparisons. I think I can do that myself without doing any research and without providing any substantial support for my argument, which is exactly what I see this essayist doing. I will fully respect your opinion that draws comparison between Obama and Hitler if you can do so logically, rationally, and with sound support; but if your only "sound support" is that you get paid to be a historian so everything you say about history is true, then I think we all should question you. Don't you think so? In stead of you telling me what is my "BIGGEST problem with this piece," let me try to state it for myself one more time: 1) It's poorly written. 2) It uses sensational rhetoric. 3) It makes historical generalizations without specific examples to back the argument. 4) It promotes no solution, which leads me to believe 5) that it simply is an effort to incite fear. So, I'm sure you and others are likely to refute my statements, which is wonderful and I am happy to entertain thoughtful insights. However, if all you want to do is bash me for being a "people like you" who "got us into this damn mess to begin with," then this is no forum for free thought and opinion.


wow, you sure seem to have alot of time on your hands.  your reasoning is completely specious, and not worth even trying to address.  have a nice day.  this has been a recording.
Logged

I don't want to get any messages saying, "I am holding my position." We are not holding a Goddamned thing. Let the zionists do that. We are advancing constantly and we are not interested in holding onto anything, except the zionist's balls. We are going to twist his balls and kick the living shit out of him all of the time.
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)

 
Jump to:  

Top Ron Paul Sites - Ranking the best Ron Paul for President 2008 Websites Top Politics blogs News Only Political Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory blogarama - the blog directory Top Political Sites TopOfBlogs Political Topsites
Top Site
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.328 seconds with 23 queries.