Brandon Dean
WizardofOswald.com
May 25th, 2009

“you’re not gonna know yourself
until your back’s against the wall…
if it’s not the ratchet
it’s the gun
and if it’s not the gun
it’s the bomb
and if it’s not the bomb
it’s poison flour…
every hour on the hour
you hear the people buy
them buy, them buy, them buy
poison flour
killing off man…”
–Dr. Alimentado

For some of us, the war for truth can take a psychological toll. It always helps me to step back at these moments, to observe the universe around me. What is missing in these moments is my balance between the seeming chaos and utter violence of the universe, and the utter beauty and calm of the universe.
When you watch a sunset, the beauty is indescribable. Yet, if you were anywhere near the sun, you would be fried to a crisp, and the sun’s light is creating that beauty.

sunset in Lost Angeles

Sometimes we neglect to see the creation all around us. I find it ironic to note that, no matter what man builds, nature immediately begins to take over again. The struggle to build is essentially the struggle to control or curb nature. But you see how primitive man truly is compared to the design of nature by observing nature reclaiming its sovereignty over man’s accomplishments:

the fence in my backyard

“God is the only comfort, He is also the supreme terror; the thing we most need, and the thing we most want to hide from. He is our only possible ally, and we have made ourselves His enemies.“
–C.S. Lewis, from Mere Christianity

But creation exists nonetheless, from both God’s and Man’s perspectives. God continues to destroy and create, and Man continues to attempt to emulate God, while mostly acting like apes. Reality is too chaotic to understand on either a microscopic or macroscopic level; only within our sliver sized frequency range do we perceive our universe. The rest is far too complicated. So we observe our universe and try to emulate the creation and destruction we see every day. The destruction is evinced through war and conflict, while the creation is evinced through art and technology. War and conflict have fomented technology and even art at times in history, while art and technology have, at times, fomented war and conflict.

artwork by Brandon Dean

“I was in the country, and the fences were falling over, for miles. And no one knew where I was in that beautiful wasteland. I could have blown off the side of the globe and what would it have mattered? Who would have noticed? My memory does not rely on the landscape, nor the fog rolling off the mountaintops, nor the hawks floating on the wind. It relies on the awe I felt, the Blessed helplessness. Looking in the face of the unknown and enjoying the release of stability, open-eyed. Happiness.”
–Brandon Dean, from The Life and Tendencies of One Don Incognito

my orchid

“It’s a sad and beautiful world.
It’s a SAD and BEAUTIFUL world!”
–from the film Down By Law by Jim Jarmusch

copyright Brandon Dean 2009

Related Posts:

• MSM: Revealed – The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich …in the EU
• Propaganda is making the Truth Movement Totally Irrelevant
• The Kingdom of Lies
• Incriminating Evidence Of Israeli War Crimes
• 9/11 Shock Opera… Act 4 – Building 7 and Flight 93: The Grand Finale that Wasn’t

Google says it’s a “100 percent opt in” service that only works if you sign up for it, but there’s something fishy about all this they’re not saying: How is it that Google has access to cell phone tower triangulation data in the first place?

A typical programmer (or even a company) can’t simply announce they’re creating an online mapping program and get access to cell phone tower triangulation data. This requires some sort of high-level data interchange between Google and telecommunications companies — you know, the kind of data interchange normally reserved for the FBI or CIA. That Google now has this technology is downright spooky (and “spook” is the right word here…).

Technically, it means that Google engineers now have access to the physical location of virtually every mobile phone user in the country. Even if they’re not making your location public, the point is they could if they wanted to.

There is a way to thwart this technology, of course: Remove the battery from your mobile phone if you don’t want to be tracked. Turning it off isn’t good enough, either: You actually have to physically remove the battery to be sure you’re not being tracked.

A history of your geographic movements?

By the way, remember how the U.S. government once subpoenaed Google to turn over details of 100 million searches? There’s no reason why the government couldn’t one day subpoena Google’s cell phone triangulation logs and request an archived history of the movements of one particular person.

Where were you on December 31, 2008? Google probably has a record of that somewhere. Every store you shopped at, every house you visited and every route you drove to work for the past year has potentially been logged and archived. This is all data that could one day be used against you in a court of law. The data could even reveal you were speeding down the interstate, ignoring speed limit laws.

With Latitude, Google has opened a can of worms into issues of personal privacy and automated surveillance. They’ve also given the public new surveillance tools that people can use to stalk each other online.

Note to husbands everywhere: Your days of “going bowling with the guys” are history. If your wife finds out about Latitude and signs you up, you’re now on a new electronic leash. Forget about calling home every hour — your wife knows where you are anyway! The same goes for wives who want to “hang out with the girls” to get away from a paranoid husband. The era of domestic stalking has been unleashed, and the implications are spooky.

About the author: Mike Adams is a consumer health advocate with a mission to teach personal and planetary health to the public He is a prolific writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and consumer guides, impacting the lives of millions of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from reading his articles. Adams is an honest, independent journalist and accepts no money or commissions on the third-party products he writes about or the companies he promotes. In 2007, Adams launched EcoLEDs, a maker of energy efficient LED lights that greatly reduce CO2 emissions. He’s also the CEO of a highly successful email newsletter software company that develops software used to send permission email campaigns to subscribers. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and practices nature photography, Capoeira, Pilates and organic gardening. Known on the ‘net as ‘the Health Ranger,’ Adams shares his ethics, mission statements and personal health statistics at www.HealthRanger.org

Related Posts:

• A Nation Transformed by Fear!
• The Zionist Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
• The Posse Comitatus Act and Homeland Security
• Israeli Wiretappers, the NSA, and 9/11
• 9/11 Shock Opera… Act 4 – Building 7 and Flight 93: The Grand Finale that Wasn’t

A most disturbing report is circulating in the Kremlin today stating that the newly installed US President Barack Obama has survived, during his first day in office, a coup attempt designed to plunge the United States into ‘immediate’ war and threaten our World’s existence.

According to these reports, the Bush appointed Chief Justice of the United States, John Roberts, ‘deliberately’ failed to properly administer the Oath of Office to President Obama during yesterdays swearing in ceremony, and which then resulted in the, again, the Bush appointed American Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates [pictured 3^rd photo, left, with Bush], who at the time of Obama’s swearing in ceremony was in hiding and designated as the Leader of the US should a catastrophe occur, to become for the past day the defacto leader of his country.

News reports from the United States are only now reporting that President Obama has retaken his Oath of Office to ‘officially’ become the leader of his Nation, and as we can read as reported by the Associated Press News Service:

“After the flub heard around the world, President Barack Obama has taken the oath of office. Again. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the oath to Obama on Wednesday night at the White House — a rare do-over.

The surprise moment came in response to Tuesday’s much-noticed stumble, when Roberts got the words of the oath a little off, which prompted Obama to do so, too.

Obama and Roberts went through the drill again out of what White House counsel Greg Craig called “an abundance of caution.”

This time, the scene was the White House Map Room in front of a small group of reporters, not the Capitol platform before the whole watching world.

“We decided that because it was so much fun …,” Obama joked to reporters who followed press secretary Robert Gibbs into the room. No TV camera crews or news photographers were allowed in.”

Not to an ‘abundance of caution’, these reports continue, was Obama re-administered the Oath of Office, but rather because during the past nearly 36 hours the United States has been governed by Secretary of Defense Gates who during his brief time as leader of the US is said to have ‘purged’ from the American Military Forces all officers previously loyal to both former Presidents Bush and Clinton.

To the ruthlessness that Secretary Gates has moved to protect his Nation, and now its new President, against his Nations own, but still Bush-Clinton controlled Intelligence Agencies, we have reported on many times previously, including the ‘death by suicide’ of US Air Force Brigadier General Thomas L. Tinsley who Russian Intelligence sources report had tried to secretly transfer to Israel some of Americas most highly guarded nuclear missiles for the Israelis to use to attack Iran and Syria, an attack which would have plunged our World into Total Global War.

Of General Tinsley’s ‘suicide’ we can read as reported by the Air Force Times News Service:

“Tinsley’s death is assumed to be a suicide, said Col. Richard Walberg, who assumed command at Elmendorf after Tinsley’s death, at a press conference Monday.

Tinsley, commander of the 3rd Wing, suffered a gunshot wound to his chest late Sunday night and was pronounced dead within a half-hour.

“To the best information, it’s possible it was a self-inflicted gunshot wound,” Walberg said.

Medical responders rushed to Tinsley’s home on base but were unsuccessful in trying to save him. Tinsley’s wife and college-age daughter were home at the time of the shooting.

Tinsley was named base commander in May 2007. He had served as an F-15 instructor pilot, F-15C test pilot, wing weapons officer, exchange officer and instructor with the Royal Australian Air Force. His previous 22-month assignment was as executive officer to the Air Force chief of staff, Gen. T. Michael Moseley, who resigned under pressure in June.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates ousted both Moseley and Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne, holding them accountable for failing to fully correct an erosion of nuclear-related performance standards.”

To the nuclear weapons reported to have been planned by Bush and Clinton forces to be secreted to Israel for their attacks against Iran and Syria we can read as reported by the Global Research Network in their report titled “Missing Nukes: Treason of the Highest Order”, and which says:

“According to a wide range of reports, several nuclear bombs were “lost” for 36 hours after taking off August 29/30, 2007 on a “cross-country journey” across the U.S., from U.S.A.F Base Minot in North Dakota to U.S.A.F. Base Barksdale in Louisiana. Reportedly, in total there were six W80-1 nuclear warheads armed on AGM-129 Advanced Cruise Missiles (ACMs) that were “lost.” The story was first reported by the Military Times, after military servicemen leaked the story.”

It is further interesting to note about these reports the continuation of the vicious war between the US Military Forces loyal to Obama and those still loyal to the Bush-Clinton Factions as we had previously reported on in our November 6, 2008 report titled “Obama Forces Launch ‘Furious’ Assault Against Bush-Clinton-CIA Nazi Coup Plotters”, wherein we had stated that Obama was ‘rushed’ to meet Iranian President Ahmadinejad in an attempt to stop Israel’s launching of Total Global War, and which new reports from Iran are now stating that Ahmadinejad has, once again, gone ‘incommunicado’ due to ‘health reasons’.

It is also important to note that the ‘first causality’ of this coup attempt was the esteemed scion of the Vatican backed Kennedy family, and daughter of the murdered American President John F. Kennedy, Caroline Kennedy, and who ‘suddenly’ withdrew her bid to replace Hillary Clinton as United States Senator, and which we previously reported on in our report titled “Death Threat Forces Last Scion Caroline Kennedy From Power”.

Most amazing of all of these reports however, it is not the shocking content that they contain about the titanic power struggle currently ongoing in the United States between those factions controlled by the European Banking Powers of the Rothschild’s and those of the Vatican (which in truth vary little from our reports at the outset of World War II when their ongoing, and centuries old struggle for total Global control led to the deaths of over 100 million), but, it is that even now, as our World faces the consequences of this war once again, the American people themselves have actually become more stupid than they were in the 1920’s and 1930’s when they, as they are now, are sitting silently by while the World is being plunged into economic collapse and Total War.

And in what is, perhaps, a most chilling irony facing these poor deluded American people is it is a report from the US News and World Report blogger Robert Schlesinger whose words need nothing other than their stating:

“The Washington Post reports today that the Department of Homeland Security will be permanently housed on a hilltop in southeastern D.C. The site, blog friend Peter Roff points out, is on the grounds of St. Elizabeth’s Hospital … where the first federal psychiatric hospital was established in 1852.

Are they trying to tell us something?”

The answer to this question would be and unequivocal ‘yes’ as Obama had already planned with the US Military his ‘course of action’ against his enemies, and as we can read as reported by the United States Air Force News Service in their report titled “Air Force activates provisional Global Strike Command”, and which says:

“Air Force officials officially stood up a provisional Global Strike Command Jan. 12 at Bolling Air Force Base, D.C. The provisional command will be temporarily located at the Washington, D.C., base with supporting detachments at Air Combat Command and Air Force Space Command. Its charter is to lead preparation activities for the establishment of a major command that will consolidate nuclear operations under a single organization.”

May God have mercy on these poor Americans as they have no idea whatsoever what is about to happen to them.

© January 22, 2009 EU and US all rights reserved.

[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]

Related Posts:

• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
• The Target is Iran: Israel’s Latest Gamble May Backfire
• A Nation Transformed by Fear!
• The Zionist Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
• Incriminating Evidence Of Israeli War Crimes

–Gilbert Keith Chesterton

It’s not only because a Russian former KGB and current Professor suggests so, but also because it’s been a topic of recent conversation among family, that America’s ability to maintain itself has been questioned.  A society without morals and a sound monetary policy will be short lived.  Without morality, you cannot sustain a nuclear family, and thus you have no facilities in which to maintain a culture.  Without sound monetary policy, there is no way to sustain an economy, and thus the livelihoods of a nation’s citizens are destroyed. Unfortunately liberals do not have the ability to understand these concepts, or lack the historical literacy, that our society will implode from within or be subdued from abroad.

Socialism, Central Banking, and the Welfare State all exist to serve each other. You cannot have those three entities and have a Republic which respects Individual Liberty, Property Rights, and Limited Government. It is impossible for these two forms of government to exist simultaneously. What good is financial security if you are a slave? A government extravagant enough to give you everything you need is powerful enough to extract everything you have. It is impossible for me to understand America’s infatuation with the Welfare State. Where did these ideas come from? I almost forgot – seventy years of Socialist policies which began with Franklin Roosevelt, have been celebrated since their inception, not only by those who received welfare from the State, but also from the media and public education… which proclaimed this man and his Socialism a god.

Before we blame the Free Market for all of our economic woes, perhaps we should first attempt to establish that a Free Market exists.

From the Wall Street Journal:

For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

California will form the nucleus of what he calls “The Californian Republic,” and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of “The Texas Republic,” a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an “Atlantic America” that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls “The Central North American Republic.” Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.

It could be argued that the erosion to sound monetary policy, in many ways, led to the erosion of individual morality.  The desire to raise our children with principles should always supersede the type of car that we drive, the house we live in, or the neighborhood we live in.  Our principles that we instill – should always supersede the value we place on money. Socialism and the Welfare State will always follow in the footsteps of Economic Freedom and Prosperity. If you begin your society with Socialism and a Welfare State then Prosperity would never be achieved. Economic Freedom always leads to Prosperity, and it is after Prosperity is achieved, that politicians begin the propaganda of class envy, Democracy, and the Redistribution of Wealth.

America has enjoyed unprecedented levels of prosperity in the last seventy years. Our economic health, artificially inflated by central banking, grew much faster than it should. By removing the U.S. Dollar from a gold standard, and thereby removing reasonable restrictions to the creation of credit, national and personal wealth was grossly inflated. This led to the creation of subsidies, a welfare state, a tyrannical Federal Government, and a serious decline to individual and national morality. Whether or not this will absolve the Union in 2010 remains to be seen.

The Growing American Resentment

Millions of Americans are still hung up on this old idea of individual liberty, property rights, and limited government.  I realized just how many there were when Ron Paul received over 1 million votes in the Republican primary. This surprised and impressed me. Will mankind look to themselves for the maintenance of their well being – or will we look to Kings, Monarchs, Dictators, Oppressors and Tyrants?

How can our government punish murder when it endorses the killing of our innocent? How can our government punish theft when it robs us of our wealth and redistributes it to both rich and poor? How can our government ask us to honor its will when it taxes our personal property – thus giving it a higher claim to our land and homes than we have?

The Original Constitution

When the Founding Fathers created the Constitution it was different than it is today. Like George Washington suggested:

In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments as of other human institutions; that experience is the surest standard by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution of a country; that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion; and remember, especially, that for the efficient management of your common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty is indispensable.

To insure that government respected private property rights and thus individual liberty – only those who owned property were allowed to vote. Also, to insure that politics remained local – constituents were only allowed to vote for their respective Congressman and State Legislature. Voters were not allowed to cast a ballot for President or Senate – thus insuring that National Politics remains local. But our politicians were smarter than the Founding Fathers and sought, thinking of their own ideology and greed, to corrupt this system which guaranteed liberty and limited government.

Naturally those who pay taxes and possess private property are much more likely to limit the size and scope of government powers and its abuse of liberty.

By steering the citizen to focus on one man for the solution to his woes (President), we’ve deduced our Republic to a group of irresponsible adults seeking a King or Dictator to solve all of life’s problems. Rather than looking to ourselves and the market for the answer to life’s struggles – we’d rather direct our liberty and allegiance to a hollow entity – which can only exist by removing the power we retain over our own lives.

Civil rights vs private property rights

One of the unforeseen consequences of the civil rights movement was unhinged meddling in our places of business by Local and Federal Government. Civil rights legislation trumps property rights they say. If you own your own business the government has a right to regulate that business. If you work hard, save your money, purchase a building for entrepreneurship, and work hard to insure its success – the government steps in to instruct you how to hire, how to fire, how to manage, how to cook, how to clean, and how to insure a safe work environment.

Civil rights legislation was just the beginning of the government’s involvement in the management of our personal property. Such legislation set the precedent that our government has a higher level of authority in our places of business than we (the owners) have. Modern versions of this legislation can be seen in our tobacco smoke bans, in our cooking oil bans, and our handicap friendly requirements.

How can our government ask us to be color blind when our legislation isn’t? If an alien from outer space came to earth and toured our government’s legislation, one thing would be obvious. The government believes that blacks are inferior in mental ability and ambition. How else can you explain the Liberals never ending obsession with race determined rights? In our country all races seem to struggle and then thrive – with the exception of blacks. Liberals in our country use the taxation of the masses to buy the votes of the African American. The Welfare State, the Great Society, the Community Reinvestment act…. what have these programs given the black community? These programs have destroyed their nuclear families, personal ambition, and individual pride. What can you say of a government that legislates a lower set of standards for an individual based upon the color of their skin? I do not blame the black community… I blame the white dominated government who’ve destroyed their ambitions in the name of charity.

Liberals and the way of things

Liberals very much like to say that conservatives like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh divide Americans. They never seem to think that their policies and their platform divides anybody. Their platform is simply the way of things, and should be accepted as the status quo (since they control the media it’s easy for them to create this impression). Liberals insist that those who disagree with them are the dividers – never themselves, they never divide anybody. Those who desire private education for their children – they are the dividers. Those who desire coal burning plants and gas guzzlers – they are the dividers. Those who desire limited government – they are the dividers.

And yet in the personal lives of the well known liberal politician – we see that their children attend white private schools.  We see that wind and solar technology is wonderful – so long as it’s not where they can see it.  We see that hybrids are proclaimed, and yet they refuse to purchase them. We see that government forced charity is desired – but never private individual charity, never their money.

If we have to make an exception for gay marriage (not that government should be in the business of issuing marriage licenses – they should be out of that business) then what about the growing number of Muslims in America? What about their equal treatment under the law? If the Muslim pays taxes, just like the rest of us, then who are we to deny him his equal rights to pursue a non-traditional lifestyle? Who are we to discriminate?

If it’s fair for the gay’s non-traditional lifestyle to achieve legitimacy by obtaining a state endorsed marriage, then why shouldn’t the state equally endorse the Muslim or Mormon who desires more than one wife? Or perhaps, as is poplar in his religion, he should marry a young girl of 8 or 9 years of age.  Who are we to discriminate?  What’s fair for one non-traditional lifestyle is fair for another.  If we’re going to break down thousands of years of bigotry and discrimination – why stop at just gay marriage? By what right do we command ourselves with the legislative authority to discriminate? (sarcasm intended)

Backs Against the Wall

Never in the history of this nation have those who relish individual liberty felt so lost.  It seems at every turn natural rights are being destroyed in the name of security or financial necessity.  But who’s security?  The security of a government, so obese, that the people now exist to serve it?  Or the financial necessity of those who, rich or poor, have chosen a path of irresponsibility?  Therefore our rights are chipped away, bit by bit, until the last remaining remnant surrenders or seeks to restore those lost rights.  The straw that breaks the camels back will be further economic decline.  For never on earth have such a spoiled and rotten group of hypocrites existed - as they do here in America - the land of the free.

We have reached a situation in America, with our citizens (of all walks of life) so spoiled, that the word “NO” should not be mentioned by our politicians or government. Severe economic decline will cause the government to nationalize more banking and industry. Property rights are being destroyed at all levels: city, state, and federal – and all in the name of financial necessity. The GOP, as our representatives for conservatism, never questions the government’s authority to mandate our retirement fund (social security). The GOP never seriously questions our legislation endorsing abortion. The GOP never seems to think minding our own business, is a better foreign policy solution, than regulating the global economy in the name of Democracy and Corporate Ambition.

The GOP and the Liberals are now two sides of the same coin. That any conservative votes Republican shows their allegiance to a political party often greatly outweighs their allegiance to individual liberty and property rights. When I watch the news, it’s obvious to anyone who can listen, that nearly all commentators are sold out to the two mainstream parties. Both parties, though equally loud in their empty rhetoric, exist to slowly push the American psyche into Socialism and thus the enslavement of his individual liberty.

Secession from the Union… again?

When did America develop this blood oath to the Union?  Our Founding Fathers and even Abraham Lincoln made it plain that it’s the citizens job to insure that the government protects his rights – not violates them.  The Confederacy was wrong on slavery but right on states rights.  The Civil War cemented the iron fist of the Northeast.  The northeastern states declared that they would run the economy for both the North and the South.  They killed 650,000 Americans to insure, that the power to control the economy, remained in their hands.  Over the decades Americans have been brainwashed into believing that the Federal Government’s authority is not to be questioned. Should we be found guilty of treason for suggesting that our Federal Government has too much authority and has therefore violated its pact with America? Should we be bound by mob rule (Democracy) in the face of dwindling individual liberty, erosion of private property rights, and the enforcement of an unsound monetary system?

As the Declaration of Independence suggests - do men not possess the natural rights to insure their own liberty? By what moral righteousness does our Federal Government command the authority over our lives and liberty? Is the Federal Government the creator of our rights? Or is it the collection of upstanding men, who form a government, that possess the individual rights to insure their liberty and thus the collective right to protect such liberty as a group?

On the causes of the French Revolution:

Louis XVI ascended to the throne amidst a financial crisis; the nation was nearing bankruptcy and outlays outpaced income. This was because of France’s involvement in the Seven Years War and its participation in the American Revolution.

The inefficient and antiquated financial system was unable to manage the national debt, something which was both caused and exacerbated by the burden of a grossly inequitable system of taxation. Another cause was the continued conspicuous consumption of the noble class, especially the court of Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette at Versailles, despite the financial burden on the populace.

Central banking was created to facilitate the wealth of a nation into the hands of a few men. Central banking exists to facilitate Socialism, the Welfare State, Federal and State subsidies, the destruction of property rights, and the eventual destruction of individual liberty as well as morality. In our modern America, the government exists to control our lives, not to protect our liberty so that we may chase life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But in a world where those who are born and grow up in bondage are allowed to vote – it begs the question – how could such a people be expected to embrace individual liberty, economic freedom, and limited government… while their stomachs are still full?

And how can those who desire such distant fantasies regain control of such a government?

The Future of the Union

Liberty and property rights are more important than financial necessity. What good is a full stomach, plasma television, or a new car if you’re a slave to central bankers and the corporate whores which accompany them? What good is the right to vote, when there’s only one party running? Why would those who create the wealth of a nation, the life-line of the government, continue to create wealth when the Welfare State and Corporate Greed has an equal vote for the pillaging of their purse?

I don’t know what the future of America will be. But I do know that to correct the wrongs of a society so out of step with Natural Rights and Natural Law, will require more blood than we’re willing to part with. For the global corporate ambitions of the few will not easily be thwarted by a handful of unprepared revolutionaries. Our nation has gone so far from it’s foundations of life, liberty and individual responsibility, that it cannot be corrected by voting for the latest round of politicians… which brings us to secession and civil war.

If civil unrest occurs it will have to be introduced by State Legislatures. Armed groups of roaming bandits would accomplish little more than the removal of more rights from the general population. You may think that what I’m suggesting here is out of touch with reality in America. I can assure you that it is not. Our media and Washington D.C. are out of touch with the rising resentment growing in the heartland. And if that resentment finds a foothold with individual State Legislatures things will get interesting. The average citizen is clueless of just how fast their life can change. Or of just how fast everything they believe and take for granted – can be destroyed in the blinking of an eye. All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Is a nation nothing more than lines on a map? Or is a nation a group of individuals with similar aspirations and ideology?

I would like to leave you with two quotes. Dr. Alexander Tytler, a Scot professor, wrote a scholarly tome called “The Athenian Republic” which was published shortly before the thirteen American colonies gained independence from Britain.

The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependency back again into bondage.

And from the Vermont Guardian:

Support for secession grows among Vermonters. A recent statewide survey conducted by the Center for Rural Studies at the University of Vermont found that the percentage of eligible voters who favor Vermont seceding from the Union States and becoming an independent republic, as it once was between 1777 and 1791, increased from 8 percent in 2006 to 14 percent in 2007.

Related Posts:

• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
• FDR’S New Deal v. Obamanomics in Their First 100 Days
• Bailout for the People
• America’s “Money Machine”
• The Shadow Money Lenders: The Real Significance of The Fed’s Zero-Interest-Rate Policy

The ongoing Iowa Fluoride Study (IFS), begun in 1992, follows a cohort of
children from birth. Researchers measure fluoride use and ingestion, count
cavities and document fluorosis – white spotted, yellow and/or brown stained
teeth – the outward sign of fluoride over-ingestion.

IFS researchers report, “The benefits of fluoride are mostly topical…while
fluorosis is clearly more dependent on fluoride intake.”

They explain that when fluoridation began in the 1940’s, “it was believed that
fluoride needed to be ingested early in life to provide [cavity]
prevention…Today, evidence suggests that…the benefits of fluoride are
mostly topical.”

Fluoride chemicals are added to 70% of public water supplies at so-called
“optimal” levels (0.7 parts per million – 1.2 ppm), once believed to prevent
cavities.

The IFS researchers find that “firmly recommending an ‘optimal’ fluoride
intake is problematic.” They agree with fluoride researchers Burt and Eklund
that the term “optimal fluoride intake” be dropped from common usage.

Quantifying fluoride intake is more complex than it was several decades ago
because of the widespread use of fluoridated dental products and increased
fluoride content of foods, they report.

“Thus, it is doubtful that parents or clinicians could adequately track
children’s fluoride intake and compare it with the recommended level,
rendering the concept of an “optimal” or target intake relatively moot,” they
write.

In 2003, IFS researchers wrote, “There is no specific nutritional requirement
for fluoride.” They described the fluoride content of some foods. For example:

–  Processed chicken:  4.4 ppm and 10.0 ppm fluoride
–  Cereals:  3.8 to 6.3 ppm
–  Creamed spinach: 2 ppm
–  Soft drinks: up to 1.55 ppm
–  Decaffeinated tea:  3.19 ppm
–  White grape juice:  4 ppm
–  Ready-to-feed infant formula:  from 0.15 to 0.30 ppm

“This well-done, long-term study by respected fluoride researchers, and
published piecemeal in several scientific journals, tells us that fluoride
ingestion, such as fluoridated water and supplements, is causing dental
defects with little, if any, benefit,” says attorney Paul Beeber, President,
New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.

“Thus, fluoridation damages teeth, wastes money and must be stopped,” says
Beeber.

Take action to end fluoridation here:  http://congress.FluorideAction.Net

References:  http://tinyurl.com/FluoridationDoubtful

CONTACT: Paul Beeber, JD, 516-433-8882, nyscof@aol.com

SOURCE  NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.

Paul Beeber, JD, of NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.,
+1-516-433-8882, nyscof@aol.com

Related Posts:

• FDR’S New Deal v. Obamanomics in Their First 100 Days
• A Nation Transformed by Fear!
• Bailout for the People
• Obama and the Resurrection of the UNFPA
• FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Executive Orders

Background

George Smith Patton, Jr. was born November 11th, 1885 in San Gabriel, California. George was interested in military history from an early age, and pretty much always planned on being a military hero like his father’s friend, John Mosby, who was a cavalry and guerrilla hero on the Confederate side of the Civil War.

It seems Patton was born and bred to be a warrior. Most of his male ancestors were war heroes or politicians, such as his great-grandfather General Hugh Mercer, who fought in the American Revolution, or John Patton, who was governor of Virginia. His great uncle, Walter Patton, died in Pickett’s Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg.

Military career

George Patton distinguished himself early in his miliary career. securing a position as General John Pershing’s aide during the Punitive Expedition. Pancho Villa had crossed into New Mexico early in the morning of March 9th, 1916 and attacked the town of Columbus, killing 16 US soldiers, and a few civilians.

In retaliation, President Woodrow Wilson ordered General Pershing to basically pay back Villa for the carnage. During one of the counter raids of the 8th Cavalry Regiment, to which Patton was attached, Patton personally killed Jose Cardenas, commander of Pancho Villa’s personal bodyguard. General Pershing was so happy with Patton, he called him his “bandito.”

World War One

Captain George Patton, commander, United States Army Tank Corp, 1918

Patton became a tank commander in World War I. He participated in the first tank battle of note in history at the Battle of Cambrai. He was wounded by machine gun fire in the Battle of Saint-Mihiel. The bullet went in just below his buttocks. A big joke with Patton for years afterwards was to drop his pants while drunk at a party and call himself a “half-assed general.”

For his bravery in battle during WWI, Patton was promoted to the rank of Colonel, although it was temporary, and reverted after the war back to captain. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross, the Distinguished Service Medal, and a Purple Heart.

Between the great wars, Patton busied himself promoting the idea of armored warfare, with little success until 1940, when congress finally approved, and the First and Second Armored Divisions were created. Patton was promoted to Major General in 1941, and he commanded the 2nd Armored Division. When the I Armored Corps was created, Major General Jacob Devers appointed Patton as commander.

World War Two

Patton’s first major assignment during WWII was commander of Western Task Force in Operation Torch in North Africa. Operation Torch was the codename for the invasion of North Africa. At the Battle of Kasserine pass, Eisenhower (who was tasked with commanding Operation Torch) basically hid in a bunker at Gibraltor over 800 miles away from Tunisia, and blamed his generals and soldiers for the miserable failure. Erwin Rommel’s experienced Afrika Korps stomped all over US Army II Corps, who were almost all green troops. Eisenhower, the always blundering moron, over-extended his troops and lost the field.

Patton was promoted to Lieutenant General and given command of II Corps to take back North Africa, and as his XO he chose Major General Omar Bradley, later to become Patton’s superior (though they always remained friends). Through Patton’s discipline and toughness, II Corps pushed the Italians and Germans eastward while British Field Marshall Montgomery pushed them westward. They were pushed into the Mediterranean Sea by May, 1943.

Eisenhower, the playboy who showboated with his mistress, while Patton cleaned up his mess in Tunisia

Dwight D. Eisenhower has been portrayed by posterity to be a great general who made great decisions.

General Dwight D. Eisenhower was a bumbler. He bumbled command of Operation Torch by switching commanders back and forth. For example, he put British General Sir Keith Anderson in charge of the entire front three weeks before the German assault at Kasserine, and replaced him with British Field Marshall Harold Alexander on the 11th day of the battle.

The other commanders were sickened with how Eisenhower would flaunt his British mistress Kay Summersby, and by his cowardice in building a bunker at Gibraltor 800 miles from the front while soldiers died from his blunders.

It was so bad there was almost a mutiny of Eisenhower’s generals in Tunisia, and President Roosevelt himself had to fly over there to settle things down.

Meanwhile Eisenhower took credit for the victory Patton and Montgomery had achieved at Kasserine Pass. Afterwards, he flew back to London where he flaunted Miss Sommersby at dinner parties and the like.

Eisenhower’s mistress, Kay Sommersby

Kay even allegedly got drunk in public once, and started blabbing about Ike’s poor bedroom habits, saying he got just a little too excited, and had to call it a night early, so to speak…

My point in bringing up Eisenhower is that he had a reason to resent Patton. Eisenhower had been chosen for his position above 366 senior officer candidates whom most would have argued were better suited for the position than him by Bernard Baruch.

Eisenhower basically sucked up to Churchill, who was a communist saboteur just like Roosevelt in America. He bungled most operations he was directly in charge of, and Patton disliked him heavily. Patton thought of Eisenhower as the person he really was: a bumbling playboy without a clue how to run a war. Although Patton may not have been able to publicly trash Eisenhower, he surely trashed him in private by all accounts. He did publicly trash Churchill, however.

Sicily

George Patton seemed to be in every important battle in the European theater. After Africa, Patton was then given command of the US Seventh Army for the invasion of Sicily. Again, Patton teamed up with Montgomery’s British Eighth Army to take the island.

During a hospital visit while in Sicily, Patton came across a soldier, Charles Kuhl, who was in the hospital for battle fatigue. Patton accused Kuhl of cowardice, and slapped him with a glove in front of reporters and other observers. Reporter David Katz broke the story, and it became a huge scandal. Patton was relieved of duty for some ungodly reason… He probably shouldn’t have slapped the guy,but he was the best Allied general in Europe. He was one of the few the Germans actually feared and respected. A reprimand probably would have served just fine.

The Battle of the Bulge: Eisenhower screws up yet again

Eisenhower chose to leave Army VIII Corps outside the town of Bastogne, Belgium in the beginning of the winter of 1944. Patton saw that the Germans were building for a possible offensive from the Ardennes Forest surrounding Bastogne. He wrote to headquarters:

“… The First Army is making a terrible mistake in leaving the VIII Corps static, as it is highly probable that the Germans are building up east of them. [in Bastogne]”

He was ignored by Eisenhower and his staff. The Germans led a massive counter-attack right where Patton said they would, and they trapped thousands of soldiers in the small town of Bastogne for about a month while supplies had to be air dropped. Generals Bradley and Hodges received the Distinguished Service Cross each for their command of Bastogne, when it was Patton who came charging to the rescue. Eisenhower’s, Bradley’s, and Hodges’ blunders and timid leadership had almost cost the lives of everyone trapped in Bastogne. Patton’s Third Army didn’t receive any awards, commendations, or even a public thank you for their bravery. They broke the German lines and freed the surrounded divisions in Bastogne.

18,000 soldiers died in the Battle of the Bulge, and 80,000 were wounded… If Patton hadn’t come to the rescue, there might have been 200,000 Allied casualties…

Patton discovers the real enemy

Patton was a true believer in war. He became cynical as time passed and he watched the bungling of the war in which his supreme commander was cow-towing to the Russians and jockeying for political gains rather than military ones. Patton believed in never stopping his pursuit of the enemy, yet he was constantly held back by the high command. Patton was a warrior through and through. He would have taken Berlin weeks if not months before the Russians managed to get there and rape and pillage the entire city. At every chance, Eisenhower held Patton back from victory, yet Patton stole the day anyway. Eisenhower hated Patton.

My opinion is: the reason Eisenhower was put in the position of power he was put in was to carry out the genocidal policies of his controllers. Patton despised Eisenhower, especially after he discovered some of the operations Eisenhower was involved in and fully endorsed.

One was Operation Keelhaul, in which Eisenhower approved the deportation of 1.5 MILLION anti-communist refugees from Russia. Stalin sent them to the gulags, where they were tortured and killed. They were sent to Russia in train boxcars, just like the Jews sent to Aushwitz. hmmm… Eisenhower even sent Russian Defectors who had fought for the US Army, because Stalin wanted them. Many killed themselves rather than go back to Stalin and certain torture and death…

Next, Eisenhower made his own little death camps, in which German POW’s were put into open pens like cattle and left to rot. Out of 1.4 million of these POW’s, over a million died.

Eisenhower fire-bombed major German cities such as Dresden, even if they had no military use at all, or even soldiers quartered there. They did it just to terrorize the public into submission. Of course to do this they had to burn women, children and the elderly to death in their beds in the middle of the night…

And lastly, when Patton was made governor of post-war Bavaria, he was ordered to kick upper class German families out of their houses to accommodate rural Jewish families who were basically given carte blanch to take over any German house they wished.

Patton saw this as a travesty, and he refused Eisenhower’s orders.

This enraged Eisenhower and the high command, and Patton was transferred to the 15th Army, which was in charge of writing a history of the war.

Patton truly was a son of a bitch

Patton was known for his anti-jewish, and especially his anti-communist, views. There is no denying he thought the whole Soviet Union was a Jewish conspiracy. But those of us who know the difference know the Russian Revolution was a ZIONIST ATHEISTIC BANKER conspiracy, not a Jewish one. There is a huge difference. It seems Patton did not see this difference, however.

But he did recognize the true enemy as communism, however, and saw the German people themselves as very much like Americans–a very modern society which had true potential to be powerful American allies in the future. As occupation governor he actually had SS units start to train again, in order to have some semblance of dignity. He believed once Hitler was out of the way, the Germans could help us defeat the real enemy: Stalin and communism. He was infuriated by the Russians being our allies, and he viewed Stalin as far worse than Hitler. He didn’t want what he called an “army of Mongolian savages” running half of Europe.

But Patton never did shut up about Eisenhower and the rest giving up half the spoils of victory to the Russians, and handing over centuries of culture in German industry and infrastructure to mountain people he saw as inferior and uncultured. He saw them as jackals who fed off the corpses of brave soldiers who had actually fought.

Now, to put this in perspective, I personally have distant relatives on my mother’s side who were in concentration camps as Khazarian Jews. These are the exact people Patton was against giving German-owned property to. And I agree with him. Most of the people who came and claimed German property were never wronged in the first place, and were only opportunists. Most of the actual victims of concentration camps were either killed or deported to the newly formed country of Israel in Palestine against their will.

Patton’s car “accident”

US Army Colonel Charles Lindbergh, national hero, and future presidential nominee:

“There are German children who gaze at us as we eat … our cursed regulations forbid us to give tham anything to eat. I remember the soldier Barnes, who was arrested for having given a chocolate bar to a tattered little girl. It’s hard to look these children in the face. I feel ashamed. Ashamed of myself, my people, as I eat and look at those children. How can we have gotten so inhumane?”

Lindbergh was speaking of the Morgenthau Plan, which Eisenhower implemented in post-war Germany, in which American Soldiers were forbidden to feed or aid the starving German people in any way. Excess food was burnt so it could not be scrounged out of trash cans.

Most of the officers and soldiers in post-war Germany were sickened by these conditions, and Patton was by far the most vocal. At one point he wrote:

“… I shall prove even more conclusively that he [Eisenhower] lacks moral fortitude. This lack has been evident to me since the first landing in Africa, but now that he has been bitten by the Presidential Bee, it is becoming even more pronounced.”

Patton even publicly stated he was going to move back to the united States and publicly denounce all of Eisenhower’s policies as genocidal and inhumane. He knew he was in mortal danger. His family spoke after his death of his letters home in which he warned he might be killed by friendly fire, so to speak…

On April 21st, 1945, Patton was flying to Third Army Headquarters when his plane was attacked by what they assumed to be a German fighter, but what turned out to be an inferior Polish pilot in a Spitfire.

On the 3rd of May, an ox-drawn cart charged Patton’s jeep, slightly injuring the general.

On October 13, 1945, Patton was in his official car when it was struck by another military truck. It didn’t kill him. Upon arrival at the hospital, Patton was put in isolation. No one was allowed to visit him the day of the 13th. That day he was injected with a substance to give the appearance of a heart attack, and he died the next day. His wife had flown to Germany to be with him, but he couldn’t talk to her before he died….

It was suspected for a long time that Patton was killed, but on September 25th, 1979, we found out what happened. Douglas Bazata, who worked for the OSS (Office of Strategic Services), publicly admitted it in front of 450 ex-high-ranking members of OSS at the Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C. Here’s part of what he had to say:

“For diverse political reasons, many extremely high-ranking persons hated Patton. I know who killed him. because I am the one who was hired to do it. Ten thousand dollars. General William Donovan himself, director of the O.S.S, entrusted me with the mission. I set up the accident. Since he didn’t die in the accident, he was kept in isolation in the hospital, where he was killed with an injection.”

Patton was destined to be a true political force when he returned home after the war. He publicly ridiculed Eisenhower once he was relieved of command, and he said he was going to expose the whole thing when he got back to the states.

For political aspirant Eisenhower, this was a death sentence. Eisenhower was the darling of the New World Order at the time, and it became a death sentence for Patton himself, yet another person, love him or hate him, who truly ended up dying for freedom.v He lived a charmed life in some ways, and he remained naive about the true state of the world perhaps until the very end, but he certainly knew how to win. And he planned on stomping the New World Order and their genocidal plans into the ground, which would have been his greatest battle and most glorious victory, before he was cut down.

Patton’s grave

Brandon Dean is a contributor to War On You from Los Angeles, California.  He is 34 years old, has been studying hidden history for almost twenty years, and writing about it for five years.  You can find this and Brandon’s other writings at his website: www.wizardofoswald.com

Related Posts:

• Heroes of the Generational Freedom Movement Part 2: General Smedley D. Butler By Brandon Dean
• FDR’S New Deal v. Obamanomics in Their First 100 Days
• MSM: Revealed – The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich …in the EU
• Adolf Hitler: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened, Part 3
• America’s “Money Machine”

By: Lee Rogers

The terrorists in the federal government are continuing to destroy any freedom and liberty that might be left in this country. Now that the Democrat faction of the one party system has a majority in both houses of Congress and will shortly be in control of the executive branch, we can expect a different agenda of enslavement and dehumanization to be implemented. One of these agendas will be the continued destruction of the Second Amendment. Not satisfied with the current mechanisms of control already in place, a new piece of legislation has been proposed that will further impose more unconstitutional regulations on people who only wish to defend their life, liberty and property by owning a firearm.

House Resolution 45 or the Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 introduced by Representative Bobby Rush (D-IL) is essentially a national firearm licensing program that will place all sorts of unconstitutional requirements on people attempting to obtain a firearm.

Related Posts:

• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
• Capitalism Snuffs out the Age of Enlightenment’s Candle
• Anatomy Of The Plot To Kill The Nation
• America’s “Money Machine”
• The Zionist Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis

The oversize white envelope bore the blue logo of the Department of Homeland Security. Inside, I found 20 photocopies of the government’s records on my international travels. Every overseas trip I’ve taken since 2001 was noted.

I had requested the files after I had heard that the government tracks “passenger activity.” Starting in the mid-1990s, many airlines handed over passenger records. Since 2002, the government has mandated that the commercial airlines deliver this information routinely and electronically.

A passenger record typically includes the name of the person traveling, the name of the person who submitted the information while arranging the trip, and details about how the ticket was bought, according to documents published by the Department of Homeland Security. Records are made for citizens and non-citizens who cross our borders. An agent from U.S. Customs and Border Protection can generate a travel history for any traveler with a few keystrokes on a computer. Officials use the information to prevent terrorism, acts of organized crime, and other illegal activity.

I had been curious about what’s in my travel dossier, so I made a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for a copy. I’m posting here a few sample pages of what officials sent me.

[+] Enlarge image

My biggest surprise was that the Internet Protocol (I.P.) address of the computer used to buy my tickets via a Web agency was noted. On the first document image posted here, I’ve circled in red the I.P. address of the computer used to buy my pair of airline tickets.[An I.P. address is assigned to every computer on the Internet. Each time that computer sends an e-mail—or is used to make a purchase via a Web browser—it has to reveal its I.P. address, which tells its geographic location.]

The rest of my file contained details about my ticketed itineraries, the amount I paid for tickets, and the airports I passed through overseas. My credit card number was not listed, nor were any hotels I’ve visited. In two cases, the basic identifying information about my traveling companion (whose ticket was part of the same purchase as mine) was included in the file. Perhaps that information was included by mistake.

Some sections of my documents were blacked out by an official. Presumably, this information contains material that is classified because it would reveal the inner workings of law enforcement.

I have grayed out other parts of the documents because they contain information, such as my passport number, that I’d rather not share. The parts I’ve blocked out are colored gray to distinguish from the government censor’s black marker.

Here’s the lowdown on the records.

The commercial airlines send these passenger records to Customs and Border Protection, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security. Computers match the information with the databases of federal departments, such as Treasury, Agriculture, and Homeland Security. Computers uncover links between known and previously unidentified terrorists or terrorist suspects, as well as suspicious or irregular travel patterns. Some of this information comes from foreign governments and law enforcement agencies. The data is also crosschecked with American state and local law enforcement agencies, which are tracking persons who have warrants out for their arrest or who are under restraining orders. The data is used not only to fight terrorism but also to prevent and combat acts of organized crime and other illegal activity.

[+] Enlarge image

Officials use the information to help decide if a passenger needs to have additional screening. Case in point: After overseas trips, I’ve stood in lines at U.S. border checkpoints and had my passport swiped and my electronic file examined. A few times, something in my record has prompted officers to pull me over to a side room, where I have been asked additional questions. Sometimes I’ve had to clarify a missing middle initial. Other times, I have been referred to a secondary examination. (I’ve blogged about this before.)When did this electronic data collection start? In 1999, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (then known as the U.S. Customs Service) began receiving passenger identification information electronically from certain air carriers on a voluntary basis, though some paper records were shared prior to that. A mandatory, automated program began about 6 years ago. Congress funds this Automated Targeting System’s Passenger Screening Program to the tune of about $30 million a year.

[+] Enlarge image

How safe is your information? Regulations prohibit officials from sharing the records of any traveler—or the government’s risk assessment of any traveler—with airlines or private companies. A record is kept for 15 years—unless it is linked to an investigation, in which case it can be kept indefinitely. Agency computers do not encrypt the data, but officials insist that other measures—both physical and electronic—safeguard our records.I wonder if the government’s data collecting is relevant and necessary to accomplish the agency’s purpose in protecting our borders. The volume of data collected, and the rate at which the records is growing and being shared with officials nationwide, suggests that the potential for misuse could soar out of hand. Others may wonder if the efforts are effective. For instance, I asked security expert Bruce Schneier Schneider about the Feds’ efforts to track passenger activity, and he responded by e-mail:

“I think it’s a waste of time. There’s this myth that we can pick terrorists out of the crowd if we only knew more information.”

On the other hand, some people may find it reassuring that the government is using technology to keep our borders safe.What do you think? Feel free to post a comment, below.

Oh, one more thing: Are your records worth seeing? Maybe not, unless you’ve been experiencing a problem crossing our nation’s borders. For one thing, the records are a bit dull. In my file, for instance, officials had blacked out the (presumably) most fascinating parts, which were about how officials assessed my risk profile. What’s more, the records are mainly limited to information that airline and passport control officials have collected, so you probably won’t be surprised by anything you read in them. Lastly, there may be a cost. While there was no charge to me when I requested my records, you might charged a fee of up to $50 if there is difficulty in obtaining your records. Of course, there’s a cost to taxpayers and to our nation’s security resources whenever a request is filed, too.

However, if you are being detained at the border or if you suspect a problem with your records, then by all means request a copy. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is required by law to make your records available to you, with some exceptions. Your request must be made in writing on paper and be signed by you. Ask to see the “information relating to me in the Automated Targeting System.” Say that your request is “made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552).” Add that you wish to have a copy of your records made and mailed to you without first inspecting them. Your letter should, obviously, give reasonably sufficient detail to enable an official to find your record. So supply your passport number and mailing address. Put a date on your letter and make a copy for your own records. On your envelope, you should conspicuously print the words “FOIA Request.” It should be addressed to “Freedom of Information Act Request,” U.S. Customs Service, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20229. Be patient. I had wait for up to a year to receive a copy of my records. Then if you believe there’s an error in your record, ask for a correction by writing a letter to the Customer Satisfaction Unit, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Room 5.5C, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20229.

Related Posts:

• America’s “Money Machine”
• The Posse Comitatus Act and Homeland Security
• FDR’S New Deal v. Obamanomics in Their First 100 Days
• The Zionist Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING

President Bush deflected Israel’s request and his administration expressed alarm about the idea of an Israeli jet flying over Iraq to reach Iran’s only known uranium enrichment site.

Bush told the Israeli officials that he had already authorized covert actions against Iran’s nuclear program and the Israelis backed off their plans. The request may have been an attempt by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to goad the White House into action before Bush left office.

###

Instead [of overtly attacking Iran], Mr. Bush embraced more intensive covert operations actions aimed at Iran, the interviews show, having concluded that the sanctions imposed by the United States and its allies were failing to slow the uranium enrichment efforts. Those covert operations, and the question of whether Israel will settle for something less than a conventional attack on Iran, pose immediate and wrenching decisions for Mr. Obama.

###

The new information supports the prediction from a US official that President-elect Barack Obama will face a “serious crisis” over Iran’s nuclear ambitions during his first year in office.

“It seems clear that Israel will not sit by idly while Iran takes defiant steps toward becoming a nuclear power,” said former US defense secretary William Perry.

Although Israel’s current aggression in Gaza may be an attempt to curtail Iran’s strength in the region, the editor of Newsweek argues that the real effect could be just the opposite.

“Within Iran also, the balance is shifting. The moderates are now silent. Reformist newspapers display photographs of dead Palestinian babies on their front pages. … By crushing Gaza militarily, Israel might actually be giving Iran’s mullahs the ideological issue they thrive on. That might be the political lesson of this war,” wrote Fareed Zakaria.

Related Posts:

• The Target is Iran: Israel’s Latest Gamble May Backfire
• The Kingdom of Lies
• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
• You Want Proof of the Zionist Control of Congress — Here it is!
• The Danger of Keeping Robert Gates

Embryo screening, which is licensed for certain serious conditions, such as Huntington’s disease and cystic fibrosis, continues to attract controversy, with claims that it is paving the way for the creation of “designer babies”. However, doctors’ leaders argue that a technique that can prevent a child from developing a life-threatening illness should not be restricted.

The UCL screening programme is focusing on the London community of Ashkenazi Jews, who have a high risk of inheriting BRCA1 and BRCA2. The NHS offers BRCA testing, but only for women whose relatives have had cancer because of the mutations. Up to 50 per cent of people with the faulty genes do not have a family history of the diseases, largely because the gene can be carried by men.

Related Posts:

• A Nation Transformed by Fear!
• INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING FOR MILITARY AND POLICE FORCES
• Crazed MI-5 and MI-6 Wreak Havoc for the Illuminati
• The Kingdom of Lies
• I Am Spartacus! Standing Up to Homeland Insecurity

Related Posts:

• A Nation Transformed by Fear!
• Bailout for the People
• FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Executive Orders
• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
• The Target is Iran: Israel’s Latest Gamble May Backfire

“The Trans-Texas Corridor, as it is known, no longer exists,” said Amadeo Saenz Jr., executive director of the Texas Department of Transportation, at the agency’s annual forum in Austin.

The state, he said, will carry forward with modifications to proposed projects and will rely heavily upon input from Texans through more town hall meetings and an updated Web site.

He also made clear that, should toll lanes be added to various roads, tolls will be assessed only on those, and not existing lanes.

The renewed effort now will operate under the name “Innovative Connectivity Plan.”

The decision won applause from a number of officials and watchdog organizations. David Stall of the citizens’ group Corridor Watch called it a major victory for Texans.

“We’re real pleased that a project once described as unstoppable has now screeched to a halt,” he said.

Saenz said the state will continue to pursue various projects, including the Interstate 69 project. If, however, more lanes are needed along U.S. 59, the state will simply widen that roadway, Saenz said.

Last January, town hall meetings conducted across the state drew huge crowds but few supporters for Gov. Rick Perry’s Trans-Texas Corridor plan, particularly among rural property owners north and west of Houston.

TxDOT announced last summer that the corridor would stick to major highways for most of the route in southeast and South Texas.

The proposal called for a network of broad corridors linking major cities, with toll roads for cars and trucks, rail tracks for freight and passenger trains, and space for pipelines and power lines.

Thousands of residents crowded into public meetings to question and lambaste the plan, complaining it would take too much private land, and bring traffic and crime to small towns and rural areas.

Perry, who is visiting troops in Iraq, said today that the name Trans-Texas Corridor is dead, but that the state will still look at public/private partnerships to build roads, including toll roads.

“The name Trans Texas Corridor is over with. We’re going to continue to build roads in the state of Texas,” Perry said.

“Our options are relatively limited due to Washington’s ineffectiveness from the standpoint of being able to deliver dollars or the Legislature to raise the gas tax,” he said. “So we have to look at some other options.”

Stall, the Corridor Watch leader, said his group understands that toll roads likely will be needed to address congestion. But he said those roads now will be built to meet local transportation needs rather than to allow a private company to profit from business development along new routes.

He said his group will continue to watch TxDOT to make sure new roads “meet the public’s transportation needs and not Wall Street’s profit needs.”

Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Chairman John Carona said the announcement “should be of great relief to literally thousands of Texans we heard from who were opposed to the Trans-Texas Corridor as first envisioned.”

It also removes a distraction for the Legislature, which will convene on Jan. 13.

“We can now focus on the real issue, which is additional road capacity and the means to finance the same,” said Carona, R-Dallas.

He said his goals are to win passage of a proposed constitutional amendment that would, if approved by voters, dedicate all of the motor fuels tax to highway funding.

Additionally, he said, the Legislature should pass a bill that ties the gas tax to inflation.

“Operating off a 1991 motor fuels tax makes funding our transportation needs impossible,” he said.

Carona said raising the gas tax will be politically difficult.

“I try to remind people, we’re not just talking about the inconvenience of congestion,” he said. “Insufficient road capacity affects the quality of life and economic development. It also effects air quality.”

Rep. Patricia Harless, R-Spring, said she is glad that TxDOT is responding to people who were concerned that their land would be condemned to make way for the huge corridors — four football fields wide — envisioned for the TTC.

“I’m optimistic that they’re going to continue to listen to the citizens and make sure that private property rights are protected,” said Harless, a member of the House Transportation Committee.

Chris Lippincott, a spokesman for the transportation department, said the public reaction played a key role in dropping the TTC.

“As we evaluated these projects against the backdrop of public reaction and assessments of local leaders, we realized we could go forward with a more modest approach,” he said.

Ya know, call me a cynical. I think this will be back sooner than later, but they will just call it something else and hide it better.

Related Posts:

• ORWELL’S 2009 – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
• 10 false flags operations that shaped our world
• Bailout for the People
• America’s “Money Machine”
• The Target is Iran: Israel’s Latest Gamble May Backfire

One thing that truly made me ill while perusing the photos of the world-wide anti-Israel protests in the last few days is the repeated use of Hamas flags/posters, as if Hamas is somehow fighting for the freedom of the Palestinians. Give me a god damn break…

For those unaware, Fatah and the Palestinian Authority were the government of Palestine until the Israelis invaded, only leaving in 2005, when Hamas had been secured in power. And hey presto! they are still the ruling party in Palestine!

Not only that, but all the Hamas fighters have (wisely) holed up and hidden themselves in anticipation of the Israeli massacre. Gee, how very convenient for them that the Israelis are content with killing 1.3 million civilians (the population of Gaza)…

The Israeli Mossad (their CIA) created Hamas in 1987, with the frontmen Sheikh Ahmed Ismail Yassin and Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi, because, as Zeev Sternell, historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, says: “Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO).”

Well ain’t that something? So, the Mossad starts Hamas, with the original “intention” of being a charitable organization to the Palestinian people. And charity they did. Slowly, of course, it turned into a political and military organization, which was the true original intention. It challenged Fatah and the PLO as it does to this day. Divide and conquer: the oldest military tactic in the book…

Do you doubt what you’re reading? Well, how about an actual photo of an Israeli Mossad agent in Hamas gear who forgot to take off his Star of David?

Oops!

Or how about July 2006, when Hamas fighters supposedly kidnapped an IDF soldier, then went to the middle of Gaza City and held a press conference about it?

If there had really been a kidnapping, those “terrorists” would have been executed, or at least arrested, on the spot. I mean, the photo above was taken not ten miles from the Israeli border! There are Israeli agents all over Palestine, for Christ’s sake!!

Hamas was invented by the Israelis to be an opposing force to the PLO, and that is the exact capacity in which it has acted. Hamas has done reportedly little to “help” the Gazans during this latest massacre besides hide. They kidnap Israelis, or even blow up Israeli bars, supposedly killing Israeli Jews. But in reality, the bar was an Israeli Arab bar, and 90 percent of the patrons are Muslim, not Jewish..

It’s nice to see the world angry at Israel for their obvious atrocities in the last few weeks, but it’s time for the world to the see the reality of the false flag operation as well. It’s time to be able to see it in the plain light of day, knowing the tactics. The Israelis are better at false flags than anyone else, as evinced by the utterly fantastical “holocaust” of World War II. And with a lie that monumental, which persists in earnest to this day, how hard is it to see the lie of the Hamas soldier, or their phony “Qassam” rockets? Again, give me a god damn break…

Must read article:
Hamas is a Creation of the Mossad, by Hassane Zarouky.

Must read book:
Devil’s Game, by Robert Dreyfuss

Brandon Dean
WizardofOswald.com
January 6th, 2009

copyright Brandon Dean, 2009

Brandon Dean is a contributer of  War On You

Related Posts:

• The Target is Iran: Israel’s Latest Gamble May Backfire
• You Want Proof of the Zionist Control of Congress — Here it is!
• The Kingdom of Lies
• The Zionist Nexus Linking 9-11 and the Financial Crisis
• Incriminating Evidence Of Israeli War Crimes